|This page was
published in "Coups de Poing" to Clovis: Multiple Approaches to
Bifaces Variability. AAA annual Congress 2000, Philadelphy.
This page examines lithic industries from southeastern Europe which contain foliated points and which have been associated by radiometric dates to the Last Glacial Maximum. Archaeological research on the Solutrean techno-complex has long been privileging caves and shelters in sedimentary regions where settlements are easier to detect. It is only in the past decade that this bias has been overcome and more systematic survey and excavation projects undertaken which have looked for open air Solutrean settlements (Vialou and Vilhena-Vialou 1990; Rasilla Vives 1994; Aubry 1998).
The archaeological sample studied for this page consists of lithic assemblages recovered from the Solutrean levels of sites located on the extremities of the Solutrean techno-complex site distribution area in southwest Europe and which appear to belong to two different regional groups. Although the quality and quantity of chronological information available for these two groups is uneven, all the radiometric dates fall within the Last Glacial Maximum (Zilhão 1997 ; Rasilla Vives and Rodríguez 1994 ; Strauss 1983 ; Duarte et al. 1999).
The northern group, located on the southern margin of the Paris sedimentary basin at the border of the Massif Central, consists of five archaeological sites - Monthaud, excavated at the beginning of the century; Les Roches d'Abilly, excavated during the 1950's, the Fritsch shelter, excavated during the 1980's; and two ongoing excavations, Fressignes and Les Maitreaux – plus three isolated superficial finds. The only available radiometric date for Abri Fritsch, from level 8d at 19,180 B.P. (Gron -5499), places it during the late Solutrean (Allain 1976). Similarities to lithic assemblages from sites on the southwest border of the Massif Central in Aquitaine which have been radiocarbon dated indicate that this site was occupied between 20,000 and 19,000 B.P. ( Geneste and Plisson 1986).
The second group consists of sites
in the Portuguese Estremadura located in the drainage basins of the
Tagus and Mondego rivers and theirs tributaries (Zilhão 1997).
This page will discuss the similarities and differences which have been observed in the movement patterns of the raw materials used to manufacture laurel leaves in the two regions. The production processes for these tool types and their discard contexts will also be examined. Functional analyses of laurel leaf points, such as the experimental protocol developed to study microscopic use wear traces on the Solutrean shouldered points from Combe-Saunière cave, will not be discussed (Geneste and Plisson 1993; Chadelle et al. 1991).
The French group from the Creuse
Valley contains 128 tools which fit the definition of laurel leaves.
The Portuguese tools consist of 131 preforms, entire pieces or
pieces fractured during manufacturing or use. We can divide these
groupings into two subdivisions. The first, which was called group J
by Smith (1966), consists of tools with lengths exceeding 25 cm,
while the second subgroup consists of pieces whose reconstituted
length is less than 15 cm.
The larger tool subgroup shares
similarities with laurel leaves found at Volgu (Smith 1966), which
when complete range between 25 and 40 cm., characteristic of
regional groups in the drainage basins of rivers arising in the
French Massif Central.
The second category of laurel leaf points has been replicated by Pelegrin (1981). Using red deer antlers of different weights, and pebbles and sandstone for grinding, Pelegrin found it was necessary to prepare each platform by isolating and grinding a spur in order to obtain a width/thickness ratio similar to the pieces from the archaeological sites. It has been difficult to confirm using archaeological data whether this was the actual procedure used during the Solutrean. The first step performed in thinning large laurel leaf points is usually missing in Solutrean assemblages as the fragments found were usually discarded after a complicated process of use.
The excavation, beginning in 1994
(Aubry et al. 1998), of a Solutrean settlement at Les Maitreaux, has
helped to overcome this sampling problem to some extent and
provided data which aided in reconstructing the entire production
sequence of these pieces. The site, discovered by Walter during a
superficial survey, lies along the bank of a small tributary of the
Claise valley that cuts through Upper Turonian limestone.
Excavation of more than 60 square
meters of this site produced 23,400 lithics which were found lying
in concentrations within a wind deposited silty shale (Aubry et al
Examination of a refitted series
of shaping flakes proved that thinning of large laurel leaves was
performed exclusively by soft-hammer percussion, with the thickness
being reduced to less than 1.5 cm. The first step of thinning was to
detach a series of covering flakes on one edge after grinding the
entire edge. These flakes were frequently overshot. The platform
for each removal was carefully prepared, with a spur created by
removing small flakes and grinding, as described by Pelegrin
(1981). As we previously hypothesized (Aubry et al. 1998), thinning
was not performed symmetrically and alternatively on the two faces.
Instead, the choice of one face for thickness reduction permitted
the conservation of the sub-cortical part of the blank, which was
homogeneous, finer in grain and more suitable for flaking. The
relative rapidness with which the first step of shaping was
performed could explain the higher frequency of breakage during this
phase. The analysis of large-sized laurel leaf preforms and
fragments shows fractures that are similar to fractures created at
the point of impact during shaping in experimental knapping of such
pieces or which could be the result of raw material flaws or
In the Creuse region the type of
raw material used for the production of large laurel leaves at Les
Roches d'Abilly, La Guitière, Monthaud and Fritsch points to the
probable existence of similar workshops near the Upper Turonian and
Low Turonian outcrops even though Solutrean sites are unknown at
these locations. Larick (1983) suggests that evidence for the
transportation of unshaped nodules has not been found in the
Perigord because of the high frequency at which breakage occurs
during the complicated production sequence for this kind of tool.
However, analysis of non-local raw material in Solutrean assemblages
shows resharpening of the edges after breakage, suggesting that
these pieces were used after breaking. Turonian flint flakes found
in level 10 at the Fritsch Shelter provide evidence in support of
this hypothesis as the nearest outcrop is 15 kilometers away.
Flakes were produced during the final retouch of pieces larger than
6 cm by a process which involved the use of spur platforms and
grinding. This hypothesis should be tested by an examination of the
raw materials used, the discard patterns, as well as use-wear
analysis of the fragments. It would explain the carefulness evident
in the final retouching of the edges with concave protected removals
and the rarity of shaping flakes at campsites, such as level 10 of
the Fritsch shelter.
There is a cluster of small laurel leaves, consisting of those less than 15 cm long when complete, within the laurel leaf group categories, which has been described by Smith (1966) and Zilhão (1997). There is little variability in their length, and Geneste and Plisson (1993) have hypothesized that they are functionally equivalent to longer shouldered points. There is a high frequency of basal and medial fragments with hinge fractures and spall removals which are characteristic of projectile breakage.
In the Creuse basin, small and large sized laurel leaves were manufactured from the same raw materials, which had been transported from as far away as 60 kilometers (Aubry 1991), the same distance as in the Perigord (Larick 1983; Demars, 1996). Larick (1983) suggests that the presence of shaping flakes at Les Roches d'Abilly, Les Maitreaux and Monthaud shows that this kind of foliate point was produced near the flint resources. Their subsequent displacement may have been greater than 20 kilometers, with the points being transported after being reduced in thickness, quite possibly in final form.
The production sequence was
different for the large sized group. In the Maitreaux assemblage,
which was manufactured from
Evidence for heat-treating, seen first in the Perigord (Bordes 1969), was afterwards recognized in other regions, and recently in Solutrean sites in Southern Iberia (Zilhão 1997; Tiffagom 1998). This procedure makes the material more suitable for pressure retouching but also significantly increases the fragility of the final point. In France, evidence regarding how extensively heat-treating was used is not available.
Although this technique was known, it was not systematically employed in the Creuse basin. Only Cenozoic and Bajocian, coarse grained varieties of flint whose suitability for pressure retouch can be dramatically improved by this procedure, were heat-treated. However, analysis of bifacial points from several Solutrean sites in Spain and Portugal has shown that heat treatment was used systematically there.
In Portugal, at the sites of Vale Almoinha, Caldeirão and Buraca Grande, a wide variety of flint was observed to have been used in the manufacture of laurel leaves. The technological study of the production sequence shows the use of flakes as blanks for shaping, with systematic use of heat treatment in the reduction process before or after the first phase of shaping by Percussion with a soft hammer. The platforms for shaping flakes don't appear to have undergone any special preparation or grinding, which probably explains why most of the breakage occurred in this phase. The first phase of reduction was sometimes followed by a second heat treatment, evidenced by the different appearance of the material on the two sides of the shaping flakes. The refitting of shaping flakes on a foliate point at the Parpallo site have shown that the process of heat treatment had been used more than once on this tool (Tiffagom 1998). The final shaping and sharpening was performed by serial pressure retouch on the entire edge.
Evidence for the transportation of
flakes or preforms at these sites is provided by a translucent
coarse grained flint whose geological origin is 30 kilometers away
from Buraca Grande Cave. Shaping and intermediate heat treatment
were performed at the campsite and at least one point was broken
during the shaping process. Twenty preforms shaped by percussion, in
some cases after heat treatment, recovered from the Monte da Fainha
open air site (Zilhão 1997) provide evidence for reserves being
These preliminary results establish that a variety of shaping and sharpening techniques was used to produce the apparently morphologically uniform Solutrean bifacial points found in southern Europe. Futhermore, while French laurel leaves, on which the definition of the Solutrean techno-complex in the Upper Palaeolithic sequence is based, have been considered to be typologically and technologically uniform, they have probably served a variety of functions as projectiles and knives. This assertion, based on the technological examination of discarded fragments, should be tested by microscopic use wear analysis on archaeological remains recovered from recent excavations.
Although there are differences visible between the two geographic areas examined in this paper, there is also a high degree of homogeneity at a regional level. There is a strong similarity in production techniques and stages of manufacture among the sites on the edge of the French Massif Central.
Also, the assemblages located in the Portuguese Estremadura bear a clear resemblance to those of the rest of southern Iberia. The geographic distribution of these homogeneities correlates with similarities in faunal resources. Similar regional trends, based on point typology and raw material supply territories, on the Cantabrian coast in Iberia, have been pointed out by Strauss (1977).
The role of environmental constraints on technological options remains difficult to define. The geographic distribution of large sized laurel leaves is restricted to the regional groups on the border of the Massif Central and seems to comply with the constraints imposed by the availability of suitable raw material blanks with appropriate morphologies. This type of raw material exists in the Cretaceous and Tertiary geological formations of the Paris and Aquitaine sedimentary basins but seems to be rare elsewhere. However, this environmental constraint can not entirely explain the variability in techniques since long blade production and large bifacial pieces created using pressure retouch are known from the Iberian Peninsula Chalcolithic (Forenbaher 1999). The systematic use of heat treatment in association with pressure retouch in the assemblages of Southern Iberia doesn't correspond to raw material availability but rather to different strategies of seasonal group displacement and modalities of cave utilization in somewhat smaller territories in Iberia (Zilhão 1997; Ripoll Perello 1991).
Nevertheless, we must not downplay
the consistency of behavior exhibited throughout the Solutrean
techno-complex distribution area, as, for instance, in the selection
of translucent varieties of flint among the available lithic
resources. Such choices can't be explained except by a network of
long distance social contacts extending beyond regional group limits.